Full is the opposite of empty, so happy is the opposite of sad. In an analogy the two pairs must be joined by exactly the same relationship: find the link in the first pair, then carry that link across.
What to say if they get stuck
Say the first pair out loud: "Full is the opposite of empty."
The same bridge has to carry "happy". These are opposites.
Chooses a word from the same topic but with a different relationship.
This is the wrong answer 11+ papers are built to offer, so it is worth watching for directly: a child who does this will look confident and still lose the mark. If it keeps happening on transfer an analogy relation, the fix is the misunderstanding rather than more questions.
Where transfer an analogy relation sits in the 11+
The 11+ does not test these skills in isolation, and practising one in the wrong order wastes the practice. These are the skills the curriculum map connects this one to.
A relation must be identified before it can be transferred.
How transfer an analogy relation differs from the skills beside it
The same exercise practises several skills, and telling them apart is often the difficulty rather than the exercise itself. On this page the skill is: apply a stated or inferred word relationship to complete a second pair, and it stops where one relation must remain invariant.
Choose the option most opposite in meaning to a target word. Excludes merely unrelated options.
Questions parents ask about transfer an analogy relation
Answered from what the skill map records about this skill, not from a template. Every answer here is on the page, and the same questions are the page's FAQ structured data.
Apply a stated or inferred word relationship to complete a second pair. It is one of 26 named verbal reasoning skills in the 11+, in the analogy strand, and this page carries 1 interactive exercise that practises it.
The skill map puts identify an analogy relation first. A relation must be identified before it can be transferred. If transfer an analogy relation keeps going wrong, that is the thing to check before doing more of this one.
There is a specific mistake recorded against this skill: chooses a word from the same topic but with a different relationship. 11+ papers are written to offer exactly that answer, so a child can be confident and still lose the mark. When it keeps happening, the fix is the misunderstanding rather than more questions.
Point at the next move rather than explaining the whole rule. Put the first pair into a sentence - "rabbit is to burrow" - and check the sentence still works for spider.
The skill map draws the line here: One relation must remain invariant. A question past that line is testing a different named verbal reasoning skill, which is worth knowing before you spend a week practising the wrong one.
The analogy strand holds 2 skills that are tested together, and the page next to transfer an analogy relation is identify an analogy relation. Each has its own exercise and its own link, and none of them needs an account.
Use Word Bridge, embedded on this page. It is the exercise the skill map attaches to transfer an analogy relation, it runs in the browser with no account to make, nothing is scored, and nothing a child does here is recorded or sent anywhere. It also has its own link, so you can send it to a child without sending them anywhere else first.
Transfer an analogy relation rests on something else being secure first
This skill depends on identify an analogy relation. A free diagnostic checks those alongside every other verbal reasoning skill, so you find out whether the problem is here or underneath it.