Skip to main content

Non-verbal Reasoning · Spatial

Validate a cube net

Determine whether a 2D arrangement can fold into a cube.

Free to use and free to share. There is no sign-up, no score, and nothing a child does here is recorded or sent anywhere.

Practise it now

Only one of these layouts folds up into a cube. Fold them and watch what happens, then pick the one that closes.

This exercise practises validate a cube net alongside its own main skill, Recognising a Cube Net.

It covers most of this skill rather than all of it.

Loading the interactive exercise. Nothing you do here is saved or scored.

A worked example

One question of the kind this skill is tested with, worked all the way through: the reasoning, and what the wrong answers are there to catch.

The arrangement that will not close up

Which one of these four arrangements does NOT fold up into a cube?

Four arrangements of six squares, each one drawn edge to edge on squared paper.

  • Three of these are real cube nets and one is not.
  • No square may be moved, and no square may be folded onto another one.
  1. A row of four squares, with one square above the first square and one square above the last square
  2. A row of four squares, with one square above the first square and one square below the last square
  3. A row of four squares, with one square above the second square and one square below the second square
  4. Two rows of three squares, joined so that the right-hand square of the lower row sits directly beneath the left-hand square of the upper row

Answer: A row of four squares, with one square above the first square and one square above the last square

How you get there

Every one of these has six squares, so counting will not separate them. Bend the row of four into a band and it makes the four sides of the cube, leaving the top and the bottom open. In the first arrangement both spare squares hang off the TOP edge of that row, so both of them fold down onto the top face and land on top of each other. The bottom is left open and one square has nowhere to go. The other three all close both ends exactly once, so those three are nets and the first one is not.

Why the other answers tempt

The first two arrangements look almost identical: a row of four with two squares hanging off it. Which SIDE of the row each spare square sits on is the entire answer, and it is the easiest detail in the question to stop noticing.

If they are stuck, say this

Hold the band of four in your head, then take the leftover squares one at a time and ask which open end each one closes. Two squares closing the same end means it is not a net.

Now do it live in The Net Checker

What this exercise is doing

The Net Checker

Only one of these layouts folds up into a cube. Fold them and watch what happens, then pick the one that closes.

This engine’s own main skill is Recognising a Cube Net. It practises validate a cube net alongside it, and covers most of it rather than all.

Layout A is the only one whose six squares close onto six different sides of the cube, which is what makes it a net. Fold layout B instead and the square in the top row, far left lands on the same side as the square in the bottom row, third from the left, so one of them would have to cover the other. Every wrong layout here is a single square away from being a real net, so a layout that looks almost right usually is only almost right.

  1. Step 1. Fold them. Tap two of the layouts to watch them try to fold. Only a real net closes into a cube - any other layout lands two squares on the same side.
  2. Step 2. Which one is a net?. Now pick the layout that folds into a cube with nothing covered up.

What to say if they get stuck

  1. Fold a layout one flap at a time and keep a finger on the square you started from. Watch where each flap ends up.
  2. Every layout here fills the grid and every one of them is a square away from folding, so nothing on the surface separates them. Fold each one up, keeping a finger on the square you started from.
  3. A layout is a cube net only when its six squares land on six different sides. Two squares on the same side means one would have to cover the other, and that layout is out.

Open The Net Checker on its own page to share it

Where validate a cube net sits in the 11+

The 11+ does not test these skills in isolation, and practising one in the wrong order wastes the practice. These are the skills the curriculum map connects this one to.

This opens up

Track opposite cube faces

Opposite-face reasoning presumes a foldable cube net.

Sits alongside

Track a paper fold

Both require folding representation, but generic paper folds and cube topology differ.

How validate a cube net differs from the skills beside it

The same exercise practises one other skill, and telling them apart is often the difficulty rather than the exercise itself. On this page the skill is: determine whether a 2d arrangement can fold into a cube, and it stops where excludes marked-face tracking.

  • Identify a cube net

    Determine whether a net folds to a cube. Excludes tracking marked opposite faces.

Related non-verbal reasoning skills

All non-verbal reasoning 11+ skills

Questions parents ask about validate a cube net

Answered from what the skill map records about this skill, not from a template. Every answer here is on the page, and the same questions are the page's FAQ structured data.

Determine whether a 2D arrangement can fold into a cube. It is one of 22 named non-verbal reasoning skills in the 11+, in the spatial strand, and this page carries 1 interactive exercise that practises it.

Validate a cube net is the step before track opposite cube faces

A free diagnostic maps the whole run of skills either side of this one, so practice follows the order the paper actually needs.