Draw one supported conclusion that is not directly stated.
Free to use and free to share. There is no sign-up, no score, and nothing a child does here is recorded or sent anywhere.
Practise it now
How strongly does the text back this claim? Set the dial to the verdict it names, then highlight the lines that made you say so.
Loading the interactive exercise. Nothing you do here is saved or scored.
A worked example
One question of the kind this skill is tested with, worked all the way through: the reasoning, and what the wrong answers are there to catch.
A conclusion the text supports without stating it
Read the passage, then choose the conclusion it best supports.
The timetable had been scraped off the bus shelter, and the pole where the stop sign used to be was cut level with the pavement. Grass had grown across the lay-by. A man standing there with a suitcase looked at his phone, then picked it up and started walking towards the main road.
The bus no longer stops here
The bus is running late today
The man has missed the last bus of the day
The man is walking to the next village
Answer: The bus no longer stops here
How you get there
Nothing in the passage says the service has ended, so the answer has to be built from what is there. The timetable has been scraped off. The sign has been cut down to the pavement, which nobody does to a stop still in use. Grass has grown across the lay-by, and grass takes time. Three details point the same way, and the man giving up and walking fits them, so the passage supports the conclusion that the bus no longer stops here.
Why the other answers tempt
"The man has missed the last bus of the day" explains the walking, and it is the kind of thing that really happens. The passage never mentions a time, a bus that has been and gone, or the end of a day. An inference needs evidence in the text, not just a story that would fit.
If they are stuck, say this
Point at the exact words that make your answer true. If you cannot point at two of them, you are guessing rather than inferring.
How strongly does the text back this claim? Set the dial to the verdict it names, then highlight the lines that made you say so.
The honest verdict is: the text proves it. Ninety-two children in one room, and one teacher listed for them. Two lines of plain record, and the statement falls straight out.
What to say if they get stuck
Move the dial first and read the words it puts under the needle: the text proves it, hints at it, gives no real clue, or says the opposite. Pick the one you would defend out loud.
A line is only worth highlighting if it changed your mind. Sounding like it is on the same topic is not enough.
Two numbers, two lines. Put them next to each other.
Highlight only the sentences that show this is true. Then show the examiner.
Evidence is not "the bit that mentions it" - it is the bit that could not be true unless the statement were true. Maya turning at the fork without checking the signpost, and warning the others about a loose step she has never been shown, both need her to have been here before. The other sentences fit the scene beautifully, but a first-time visitor could have produced every one of them.
What to say if they get stuck
A sentence is only evidence if the statement would fall apart without it.
Some sentences are about the lighthouse, or about the weather. Being on the same topic is not the same as being proof.
Look for things Maya does that she could only do if she already knew the path.
Sort each statement: written on the page, hidden underneath, or floating rubbish.
Reading well means holding three piles apart. STATED is anything you could underline: the words are physically there, like the coins being counted twice. INFERRED is what the clues force to be true even though the writer never wrote it: patched patches, counted coins and choosing between bread and a candle only add up one way, so being short of money is locked in without ever being said. UNSUPPORTED is the guess that feels sensible but has no clue behind it, like going hungry tonight, when in fact she bought the bread. The test that separates the last two is simple: name the clue. If you can point at the words that force your idea, it is an inference and you can defend it in an answer. If you cannot, you have imagined it, and in an exam it costs you the mark.
What to say if they get stuck
For STATED you must be able to put your finger on the words. If you are joining two clues together, it is not stated.
For HIDDEN, ask what the detail is doing there. Nobody counts coins twice, or chooses between bread and a candle, unless money is tight.
For the bin, ask what clue would have to exist. Nothing in the passage says what happens after she leaves the shop, so anything about tonight is a guess.
Three questions, three lines they were forged from. Hammer each pair together.
Three question types, three kinds of line, every single paper. Retrieval comes from a line that states a fact, so you copy it out. Reading between the lines comes from a line that shows without telling, so you read the clue and say what it means. Vocabulary in context comes from a line with one hard word and enough around it to work the word out. When you meet a question, name its type first. The type tells you what sort of line to hunt for and what sort of sentence to write.
What to say if they get stuck
Start with the easy weld. One question asks for a number, so it can only come from the line that states one.
A vocabulary question needs a hard word sitting in the line, with clues around it to work the meaning out.
That leaves reading between the lines, which always comes from the line that shows a person doing something without ever telling you why.
Chooses a plausible inference without enough textual evidence.
This is the wrong answer 11+ papers are built to offer, so it is worth watching for directly: a child who does this will look confident and still lose the mark. If it keeps happening on infer implicit meaning, the fix is the misunderstanding rather than more questions.
Where infer implicit meaning sits in the 11+
The 11+ does not test these skills in isolation, and practising one in the wrong order wastes the practice. These are the skills the curriculum map connects this one to.
Reliable inference depends on separating stated evidence from conclusions.
How infer implicit meaning differs from the skills beside it
The same exercise practises several skills, and telling them apart is often the difficulty rather than the exercise itself. On this page the skill is: draw one supported conclusion that is not directly stated, and it stops where excludes author viewpoint and broad theme.
Questions parents ask about infer implicit meaning
Answered from what the skill map records about this skill, not from a template. Every answer here is on the page, and the same questions are the page's FAQ structured data.
Draw one supported conclusion that is not directly stated. It is one of 41 named English skills in the 11+, in the reading strand, and this page carries 4 interactive exercises that practise it.
The skill map puts retrieve an explicit detail first. Reliable inference depends on separating stated evidence from conclusions. If infer implicit meaning keeps going wrong, that is the thing to check before doing more of this one.
There is a specific mistake recorded against this skill: chooses a plausible inference without enough textual evidence. 11+ papers are written to offer exactly that answer, so a child can be confident and still lose the mark. When it keeps happening, the fix is the misunderstanding rather than more questions.
Point at the next move rather than explaining the whole rule. Point at the exact words that make your answer true. If you cannot point at two of them, you are guessing rather than inferring.
The skill map draws the line here: Excludes author viewpoint and broad theme. A question past that line is testing a different named English skill, which is worth knowing before you spend a week practising the wrong one.
The reading strand holds 11 skills that are tested together, and the pages next to infer implicit meaning are interpret a word in context, retrieve an explicit detail and sequence passage events. Each has its own exercise and its own link, and none of them needs an account.
Use Between the Lines, Comprehension X-Ray, Inference Iceberg and Question Forge, embedded on this page. They are the exercises the skill map attaches to infer implicit meaning, they run in the browser with no account to make, nothing is scored, and nothing a child does here is recorded or sent anywhere. Each also has its own link, so you can send one to a child without sending them anywhere else first.
Infer implicit meaning rests on something else being secure first
This skill depends on retrieve an explicit detail. A free diagnostic checks those alongside every other english skill, so you find out whether the problem is here or underneath it.
