Place the commas that separate a named addressee from the rest of the sentence.
Free to use and free to share. There is no sign-up, no score, and nothing a child does here is recorded or sent anywhere.
Practise it now
Three marks are missing. Pick one from the tray, then tap the hole it belongs in.
Loading the interactive exercise. Nothing you do here is saved or scored.
A worked example
One question of the kind this skill is tested with, worked all the way through: the reasoning, and what the wrong answers are there to catch.
Worked example: Punctuating the person spoken to
Worked example: Someone is being spoken to by name in this sentence. Which version punctuates that correctly?
Come and sit over here, Grandma.
Come, and sit over here, Grandma.
Come and sit over here Grandma.
Come and sit over, here Grandma.
Answer: Come and sit over here, Grandma.
How you get there
"Grandma" is the person being spoken to, not part of what is being said, so the name is fenced off with one comma. Lift "Grandma" out and "Come and sit over here" is still a whole sentence, which is the test. The version that reads "Come and sit over here Grandma." is wrong because nothing separates "Grandma" from the rest, so the name reads as part of the sentence instead of as the person being spoken to.
Why the other answers tempt
The sentence sounds perfectly natural read aloud without any comma at all, because speech does not pause where writing needs a mark.
If they are stuck, say this
Cover the name with your finger. What is left should still be a whole sentence, and the commas go where the name was lifted out of.
Three marks are missing. Pick one from the tray, then tap the hole it belongs in.
Punctuation is the writing down of your voice. Read "Slow down Ben you will trip" aloud and you will hear two small pauses and one urgent ending. When you speak straight to somebody by name, that name gets a comma on each side to fence it off from the rest, which is why Ben needs one before and one after: without them, "Slow down Ben" sounds like Ben is the thing being slowed down. The ending is chosen by tone, and a warning shouted at somebody about to fall takes an exclamation mark rather than a full stop. Say the sentence, mark the pauses, then choose the ending that matches the feeling.
What to say if they get stuck
Read it out loud. Every place your voice pauses is a hole that wants a comma.
Ben is being spoken to, not talked about. A name you are addressing gets fenced off on both sides.
The last hole ends the whole thing. Is this a calm statement or a shout of warning?
The 11+ does not test these skills in isolation, and practising one in the wrong order wastes the practice. These are the skills the curriculum map connects this one to.
Both use a comma to fence off material from the main clause, but the material differs.
How punctuate direct address differs from the skills beside it
The same exercise practises several skills, and telling them apart is often the difficulty rather than the exercise itself. On this page the skill is: place the commas that separate a named addressee from the rest of the sentence, and it stops where excludes vocative-free openers and list commas.
Questions parents ask about punctuate direct address
Answered from what the skill map records about this skill, not from a template. Every answer here is on the page, and the same questions are the page's FAQ structured data.
Place the commas that separate a named addressee from the rest of the sentence. It is one of 41 named English skills in the 11+, in the punctuation strand, and this page carries 1 interactive exercise that practises it.
The sentence sounds perfectly natural read aloud without any comma at all, because speech does not pause where writing needs a mark. The wrong answers on this skill are built out of that, not out of random numbers, so it is worth naming out loud before your child meets it under time pressure.
No. To punctuate direct address is to place the commas that separate a named addressee from the rest of the sentence. To punctuate a list is to use commas or a colon correctly for one list construction. A vocative comma is commonly read as a list separator. Telling the two apart is often the real difficulty in the question.
Point at the next move rather than explaining the whole rule. Cover the name with your finger. What is left should still be a whole sentence, and the commas go where the name was lifted out of.
The skill map draws the line here: Excludes vocative-free openers and list commas. A question past that line is testing a different named English skill, which is worth knowing before you spend a week practising the wrong one.
The skill map connects it to punctuate a fronted adverbial. Both use a comma to fence off material from the main clause, but the material differs. That skill has its own page here.
Use Punctuation Pinball, embedded on this page. It is the exercise the skill map attaches to punctuate direct address, it runs in the browser with no account to make, nothing is scored, and nothing a child does here is recorded or sent anywhere. It also has its own link, so you can send it to a child without sending them anywhere else first.
Is it punctuate direct address they find hard, or telling it apart from punctuate a list?
Those two look like one weakness on a practice paper and need completely different practice. A free diagnostic tells them apart across all four subjects.
